- 1.5萬 views
- Popular
問題: 編輯說我的論文是抄襲的,我可以提出質疑嗎?
Detailed Question
在投稿之前,我已經用查重軟件 Plagscan 檢查過,當時報告顯示重復內容太高,所以我已經全部修改過了。但期刊編輯說我的論文在 iThenticate 顯示有 23% 的重復率,這是因為軟件不同的關系嗎?期刊沒有把報告發給我,我能對期刊提出質疑嗎? 下面是編輯的郵件: Dear Author, Thank you for sending your above paper for possible publication. Although it was felt that your research was quite interesting, we are publishing only the most highly rated papers for publication in order to maintain our high rankings and impact factor. Those papers that aren't accepted typically could improve in a number of areas such as a more thorough discussion of the design, development, testing and evaluation results; clarifying the key significance of the research contribution; novelty of the subject and its impact; making sure the references are the most recent in your paper's research field of relevance; ascertaining that the research fits the aims and scope of the journal etc. We appreciate your interest in the journal. Moreover, based on iThenticate (plagiarism software) report, your paper has been found very similar with already published material (>%23 similar). Similarity with the following reference is especially high: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture http://pib.sagepub.com/A hybrid approach for multi-weapon production planning with large-dimensional multi-objective in defense manufacturing
Write an answer...
1 Answer to this question
Answer-china
據我說知,期刊通常只提供內容重復率以及被認為相似內容的來源,目前還沒有看過期刊提供詳細的查重報告給作者,因此我不建議你向期刊編輯索取查重報告。
我也覺得你不要根據 Plagscan 的報告來質疑期刊的決定。我是這么想的:
- 期刊并沒有說抄襲是造成拒稿的唯一原因
- 你的查重結果論點不夠有力,期刊是遵循他們的政策,有可能不會接受 Plagscan 的查重結果。如果你當初用的是 iThenticate,還比較站得住腳。
- 不同查重軟件顯示不同的結果不意外,這里有個事例:http://copy-shake-paste.blogspot.in/2011/06/plagiarism-detection-software-and-zu.html
就我來看,最好的辦法是人工比對期刊提供的來源與論文內容的相似度,然后盡可能再修改論文內容,你可以在修改后再用查重軟甲再檢查一次,之后再改投別的期刊。