The university press - a system on life support

The university press - a system on life support

A?university press?is most often a loss making entity serving an established research university. In addition to producing textbooks?for students, its rationale has long been to serve the needs of scholars by publishing peer-reviewed research, advancing the university’s academic mission, and helping faculty members gain tenure. With several universities facing funding?pressures,?it has become increasingly difficult for academic administrators to justify the subsidies necessary to keep their presses going.

Carl Straumsheim?(Inside Higher Ed)?explores the daunting challenges currently facing this venerable institution. For the university?press, print sales have never been a dependable source of revenue and these are in decline because of online competition from used/rental books. Publisher driven e-book sales have a long way to go before they can offer effective revenue solutions. A?few top universities in the world have the endowments needed to?keep this system going; however, the vast majority will have to prioritize their expenses differently.

According to Straumsheim, the leading share of expenses (over 50%) is on account of staffing costs?while printing accounts for roughly 10% of total expenses; hence, moving from print to digital isn't going to solve the underlying problems. If the press is to survive, it must look to outsourcing non-critical operations; a concept that may be quite unpalatable at the moment.

The university press is in no way irrelevant to its?stakeholders. It continues to be an important part of scholarly communication, especially in the humanities and social sciences. It is held in high esteem by the press and general public; further, the awards conferred by leading professional bodies and academic associations are a testament to its impact and value.?

As someone who has personally benefitted from access to its output, I can only hope that the university press adapts and thrives in the?coming years. I'm positive most of us want more than fifty shades of pulp fiction in our literary heritage.

期待學術生涯高歌猛進,發表過程一帆風順?

來加入我們活力洋溢的在線社區吧。免費注冊,無限閱覽。

社交賬號一鍵登入

已有54300名科研人員在此注冊。

意得輯專家視點 Editage Insights 目前正在維護中。維護期間,部分站點功能,如登錄、注冊可能無法正常工作。

覺得有用?

如果是的話,和你的同事分享吧