問題： 審稿人建議接受，為何期刊還要把我的論文再送外審？

我跟期刊又有問題了，上次的問題有提到，我對期刊編輯部的核準流程、決策延遲還有不回復我的郵件有有意見，我再次感謝你上次的回復。 就像我上次提到了，我的論文已經修了兩次（小修），而審稿人建議接受我的稿件，但同時也建議進一步審查。然后我又根據審稿意見修改，之后狀態變成了 decision in process 超過一個月，我問了期刊，他們的回復是：Your revised paper has been recommended for acceptance. Once a paper is recommended, it has to go to the Editorial Board for their final approval - all papers recommended in any given month go at the end of that month to the Editors. The approval process then takes a further four weeks. You will, therefore, receive a formal decision from us by the end of January。 從那封郵件之后，期刊到一月底都一直沒有消息，我又發了好幾次郵件都沒有回應，最后期刊終于回信了：When looking at your revised paper, the Editors decided that the report we received was not sufficient enough in order for a final decision to be reached. We have, therefore, secured a second referee for your paper. As soon as we have received the report and a decision has been reached we will communicate this to you。 我對這個回答感到震驚，這次表示期刊對自己的審稿人的意見不滿意，然后過了這么久之后（都超過 7 個月了），他們才決定再請別的審稿人審稿，整個決策流程再重來一次。我覺得期刊一直在重復這過程讓我無法查論文的狀態，等我累了之后再拒掉我的稿件。你覺得我這樣的看法對嗎？（這個期刊還是愛思唯爾的）我是不是該撤稿改投？我該拿這個期刊怎么辦才好？